Our Mission is to restore the Continental uNited States for America back to We The People....This is necessary because of the fraud, abuse and theft perpetrated by a for-profit corporate entity known as the UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT!


“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
Calhoun Estate Official Website! "Authentication of Certificate of Live Birth..."
Check out about Admin Remedies and Authentication Process @ fightthefraud.com

Note: USC = United States Codes. (Ex: 18 means Title 18, 241 means Section 241). These are available on line and are “Federal Laws” lawfully binding on all States.
Today in America, we are subject to criminal and civil actions of attorneys. These are usually commenced and prosecuted in the name of some “Imaginary Person” (Corporation) , the corporate “STATE” or corporate “UNITED STATES”. All cases of this nature are prohibited by the 11th Amendment. All these “Foreign States” are prohibited by the 11th Amendment of the “Constitution for the united States of America” to commence or prosecute any action. To file any cause of action with one of these as “Plaintiff” is “Fraud” 18 USC 1001 and “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241.
Criminal Actions: 
The 6th Amendment secures the accused the right to face all witnesses against him. Therefore, this law requires the “Plaintiff” (injured party) be a physical human being that can be cross examined. The only time an attorney can act without a human “Plaintiff” is in the case of “murder”. All other cases require the “Plaintiff” be present in court. 
Lawful Challenge:
Demand your 6th Amendment right to face your accuser. Demand the “Prosecutor” produce the “Injured Party”. If “Prosecutor” can not produce an “injured party” demand dismissal of complaint for lack of injured party. The court has no “jurisdiction” to proceed. 
Principles of Law:
To establish a “crime” has been committed, there must be present evidence that you “injured” another human being or damage his/her property. Attorneys have created “imposter laws” that establish “victimless” “crimes”. This is “Fraud” 18 USC 1001 for any attorney to present these imposter crimes, without injured party, claiming authority to prosecute. When a “Plaintiff” can not be cross examined, no judge can prove due process of law was administered. “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241 of the “Prosecutor” and “Judge” acting in “Prosecutorial Misconduct” in “Conspiracy to convict” must be reported to the proper authority. Failure of that authority to prosecute the “Attorney” and “Judge” is “Misprision of Felony” 18 USC 4. 
Demanding Rights:
When you are arrested on a warrant, demand to be taken before the judge who issued it, right then. Taking you to jail is “kidnapping” and being held for ransom. Every warrant issued is to bring you before the court, not take you to jail. You are guilty of nothing and can not be subjected to possible violence of jail, with out due process of law. Demand to be taken before the judge. If the Officer refuses, tell “Officer ****” I now charge you with “Kidnapping” and will be talking with a US Attorney when I am released.”
A bond is for one purpose to insure your appearance in court. Tell the judge my word is my bond I will appear. I will not allow you to extort money on my word. Any amount you demand of me to retain my freedom is extortion. I state for the Record My word is my Bond and I will appear. 
Challenges to Judge: Universal to all cases.
A judge who refuses our law is loyal to some other authority. Ask the “Judge” if he/she is a member of the “STATE BAR ASSOCIATION”. If so, challenge the “Judge” under 22 USC 611 as a “Foreign Agent”. All “Judges” are lawfully required by 28 USC 372 to have an “Oath of Office”. Ask the “Judge” if he/she has an “Oath of Office”. If yes, accept the “Oath of Office” in “Admiralty Jurisdiction”. Now the “Judge” is subject to criminal prosecution and civil litigation for any injury he/she may cause you. If no, the attorney is not a judge and has no lawful authority to proceed. Your State Representative should be informed by “Petition for Impeachment of Judge”. Present the facts of the case, the law is not necessary. Have it notarized and send it by Certified Mail. As we remove the unlawful judges, lawful judges will take their place.

Civil Actions:

Most of the cases filed as civil actions are “Fraud” of attorneys claiming a “Corporation” has rights, privileges and immunities in court, common knowledge dictates a Corporation is an artificial person without natural rights. For an attorney to file a civil action with a “Corporation” as “Plaintiff” is clear “Fraud on the Court”. A “Corporation” can not sign a “Power of Attorney” or give any attorney verbal instructions to act on its behalf. Therefore, no attorney can lawfully represent any “Corporation in court”.

Lawful Challenge:
Demand the “Plaintiff” appear. Because the 6th Amendment secures that no person will be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law. Therefore, the “Plaintiff” must appear and state he/she is owed a debt, the debtor must be given the right to challenge this debt for “validation” 15 USC 1692g. Only an “injured party” can claim a debt is owed. “Imaginary persons” can not appear or give testimony and can not be the “Plaintiff” of any cause of action. Challenge the attorney as a “Foreign Agent” 22 USC 611 acting for a “Foreign State” (Corporation) who has commence action in violation of the 11th Amendment. Demand dismissal for lack of jurisdiction.
Principles of Law:
The people have rights, Corporations do not have rights. Among these “Rights” is the right to contract, the people have this right under 42 USC 1981. The people exercise this right by their signature and/or Social Security Number. Corporations can not sign and therefore can not enter into any contract, with any attorney. The right to contract is reserved to the people. This is established by the age old principle of “Agency”. To establish an “Agency”, the “Principal” must ask the “Agent” to perform a task. The “Agent” must agree to perform the task. It is a time tested principle, of “American Jurisprudence” that the “Court” must not rely upon the “Agent” to prove “Agency”. The “Court” must follow the “Principal” to establish “Agency”. The law is simple no “Principal” no “Agency” with “Capacity to Sue”. Case must be dismissed.

There are many “Organized Crime Operations” being conduct in the “Corporate Courts” of the “UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT”. There are two classifications of courts in the “United States of America”, these are, “…one Supreme Court, and such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” According to Article III, Section 1 of the “Constitution for the united States of America”. Since the “Civil War” these “Courts” have been operated as “Corporate Courts” for the profit of attorneys, who engage in the business of “Organized Crime” in these courts. Some of these are as follows:
Foreclosure Proceedings:
This has become a “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241 of judges, attorneys and banks to steal private property under the color of law. “Foreclosure” is noting more than intimidation, threats and coercion of a person to forfeit their private property to an attorney and the judge who sell it to a bank for profit. “Foreclosure Sale” is the attorney selling your private property, usually to a bank by sealed bid at a fraction of the value of the property, without proof of ownership. Then the attorney acts on behalf of the “Corporation” to commence and enforce “Eviction” by force of arms of the police, sheriff, deputy or federal marshal. This is the widest spread “Organized Crime of Extortion” in American History. The following is the method to defeat this criminal conduct.
1. Dispute the Debt.

The Attorneys’ first step is usually to send you notice of foreclosure, giving you 30 days to “dispute” this debt. The answer is simple dispute the debt.

Method of Disputing Debt 
Send a business letter to the judge, attorney and mortgage company, by Certified Mail, stating as follows:
“I dispute this debt, I dispute all claims of contract 15 USC 1692g.”
Note: 15 USC 1692a-n, known as the “Fair Debt Collection Act” says what “Debt Collectors” can and cannot do in the process of collecting a debt. You should copy this for your information.

2. If you go to Court:

a. Challenge “Agency” of attorney with “Plaintiff”. Challenge Attorney’s “Capacity to sue” for a corporation. As outlined above.

b. Demand the attorney produce the “Original Note” for return by the judge if “Foreclosure” is granted. The “Plaintiff” can not keep the “Note” and take the property, it is lawfully required to give up one or the other. Tell the court you will keep the property until the “Original Note” is produced.

c. Should the judge refuse to comply with the law, place a 2 cent postage stamp on the back of his order in the lower right hand corner, of each and every page, and sign your name across it. This establishes any further action by the judge is “Mail Fraud” 18 USC 1341. This crime should be reported to the postal inspector for investigation and prosecution.

Note: Every “Foreclosure” can be beat by this simple method. When a corporation receives a “Promissory Note” signed by you they deposit it and receive the amount plus additional money for the purchase of their contract, by the Federal Reserve Bank. The “Promissory Note” once “monetized” is removed from circulation can not be enforced. Therefore a copy of your note is not admissible, only the “original” will do to establish right to property. Demand it, it is your right to its return if “Foreclosure” is granted.

Tax Collection: 
Another, favorite “Organized Crime Operation” of attorneys and judges is “Tax Collection”. In this scam, the United States Attorney acts in “Fraud” to claim the “IRS” is government and fraudulently claims a debt is owed to government under Title 26 of the United States Codes. But the “IRS” is not government, it is a “For Profit Corporation”. Therefore, it must be dealt with like any other “Debt Collector” under Title 15, specifically 15 USC 1692a-n, commonly referred to as the “Fair Debt Collection Act”.

Step One:
Dispute all debts in writing. By answering the claim and placing it in dispute, the IRS is required to prove their claim in court. 15 USC 1692g. (Dispute as above)
Step Two: 
Challenge the IRS Agent to prove he is a government official. False or misleading statements by a “Debt Collector” is prohibited 15 USC 1692e. This establishes the crime of “Fraud” 18 USC 1001 by the IRS Agent. Demand the Agent produce the contract you signed with him. When he can not no contract is present no jurisdiction for the court can be established.
Step Three:
“Validate” the debt. The IRS Agent always claims you owe this debt. So make them prove their claim. Demand the IRS Agent, produce the physical human being who “assessed” your taxes. They have not produced one to date. By not being able to produce the person who assessed your taxes, they can not validate the debt because it can not be proven correct or incorrect by cross examination. Demand a dismissal of all claims.
Step Four:
If a debt can not be validated, there can be no collection of it. This is established by 15 USC 1692g(b). Disputed Debts a debt collector must cease collection of the debt until it is validated.
Step Five:
Challenge attorney for “Agency” with IRS as outlined above. 
Step Six:
Challenge Judge for “jurisdiction” without a lawful claim as outlined above.
Dealing with Law Enforcement: 
When a “Debt Collector” comes to steal your property. Call the police. Ask the officer to get the copy of the “Judgment” signed by the judge. If none is present, ask the officer to remove the “trespassers” from your property. 
If a “Judgment” is presented turn it over and put a 2 cent postage stamp on the back lower right hand corner of every page and sign across the stamps. Hand it back to the officer and tell him this document is “Mail Fraud” 18 USC 1341 a felony crime and you want the officer to return it to the judge for investigation. The document lawfully challenged can not be enforced. Ask the Officer to identify all persons present by proper identification for possible prosecution. Then ask the Officer to remove these criminals from your property.
Police Officers protect rights, if you express your rights, they must enforce them.

All Debt Collectors:
Corporations of all kinds fall into the classification of “Debt Collectors”. If a “Corporation” is attempting to collect money from you, it is a “Debt Collector” and must act within the “Fair Debt Collection Act” 15 USC 1692 a-n. Whether it be credit card company, auto finance company, loan company, bank, mortgage company or other lending institution all are accountable to law. When you understand the principles of law you can not be defeated by lies of what is or is not law spouted by incompetent attorneys who are ignorant of law by law. Article I, Section 10 prohibits “Titles of Nobility”, issued by states. All attorneys have unlawfully accepted the title of “Esquire”. Thus they are clearly incompetent in law and should not be relied upon as a source of legal advice. Their acceptance of a “British Atoned Registry”(BAR) “Title of Nobility” establish their loyalty to the crown, challenge them as “Foreign Agents” 22 USC 611. 
Principles of Law to remember: 
1. No attorney can appear in court without the physical human being he represents. “Agents can not testify for principals.” Challenge every witness to prove they are the principal, by asking for their Driver’s Licenses, proving they are the “principal” i.e. “BANK OF AMERICA”. If they are not, demand their testimony be removed from the record as “Hearsay” testimony. An imaginary person can not appear no agent can speak for them. All agents are defeated by this process.

2. No “Debt Collector” can collect any debt without the “Original Wet Ink Signed Contract” being present in court. Copies are not admissible, object to them as forgeries. I don’t remember this contract my signature could have been copied from anywhere. This contract is the “subject matter” of the “Court’s jurisdiction”. Without it the court has no jurisdiction to proceed. The court must dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

3. If a judge refuses your lawful demands, challenge him as a last result as outlined above. Then send a “Petition for Impeachment of Judge ***” to your state representative and demand his removal from “Public Office”. In this manner all, in court become accountable for their conduct.

In the words of the great “Robert Fox” when you go to court you have two options, accept what the judge says without controversy and suffer the consequences or fight for your rights. I believe we have just went along for far too long, I say challenge every case no matter how small. 
By representing yourself, you are competent and must be respected by your public servants. Their failure to act properly is grounds for their removal from public office. When you hire an attorney, you declare yourself incompetent and in need of court direction. You are a ward of the court. I can speak for myself and so can you. With a basic understanding and your refusal to let those issues slide, the court is forced to act in your interest. Failure to do so establishes a “Conspiracy against rights” 18 USC 241by the judge and attorney to deny you your rights in court. Contact the US Attorney’s Office and file a “Criminal Complaint”. If they refuse, jurisdiction is established for “JAG” in “Admiralty Jurisdiction” 28 USC 1333. File your complaint with the Judge Advocate General’s Office in Washington.
Other tools of interest:
Every American should study and learn the “Constitution for the united States of America” and their individual “State Constitution”. These can be obtained through the “Secretary of State’s Office” in your State Capital. Usually they are free.

Note: The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly held that any judge who acts without jurisdiction is engaged in an act of treason. U.S. v. Will 499 US 200, 216, S.Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821).

From here you start your own quest for knowledge. Everything you learn, know and can communicate is yours for your lifetime and those you share it with. Educate the young, because they will need it. Teach a friend and help him understand. When you speak our law do it with conviction, because you speak for all the people against injustice. When we all stand together in knowledge there will be no controversy, we can not over come. I give you this gift of knowledge, how you treat it determines its value. Trash or Treasure.

I offer it in the age old principle, “Give a man to fish and you have fed him for a day, teach him how to fish and you have fed him for a lifetime.
God’s will be done.

We are brought up in indoctrination to wave the Flag, and be proud of our imagined "Freedom". Most citizens have NO CLUE about the great US  of A, or its creation!

***Can You Handle the Truth about what the Government is really doing! We need to hold accountable these corporate officials who go above and beyond their Oath of Office!!!*** 
The Truth About the Holy See and The Vatican!
Must Read!
Click on the Image above
The Vatican is not a place of love and peace, as one might imagine. It is a place of dark rituals and great secrecy. 
Click on the image above

H.R.3332 - Law Enforcement Torture Prevention Act of 2015

Check out this site to Donate to Jim and Lisa who have been under attack by this corrupt system and so much invested in legal fees... Click on their photo above to visit their site...
*If you wish to make a donation to help with the website expenses please click on the PayPal button above*
((paypal email))
We The People standing On The Land!
Taking back what rightfully belongs to US!
*Public Records Information*
This site actually has info on the Authentication Process! Click above to check it out!

Four Corners Doctrine "Freedom Through Knowledge"

The Sovereign Project Welcomes You! Ignorance of the Law is No Excuse!
*Click Here*

John-Henry: Hill, M.D. "Law Blog" Exposing the Truth!

Check out Boris's Website called Iamsomedude! Very useful knowledge and tools that you will need! 


Why "Authenticate" the Certificate of Live Birth?

(b) Properly authenticated copies or transcripts of any books, records, papers or documents of any department or agency of the United States shall be admitted in evidence equally with the originals thereof.

What is MATRIX?
In the civil law. The protocol or first draft of a legal instrument, from which all copies must be taken. See Downing v. Diaz, 80 Tex. 436, 16 S. W. 53.

Law Dictionary: What is MATRIX? definition of MATRIX (Black's Law Dictionary)

Therefore the Title/Matrix to the Organization would be the Certificate of Live Birth/BC.

Since a Certificate is defined as an instrument that shows a capacity to operate then we are given the role of Agent for the registered organization, and an Agent must have a Principal. So who is the Principal?
The Private side is not PUBLIC, therefore it's Secret. So who do you send the Notice of Status/DOS?
The Secret-ary/SOS.
The Secretary of State is the Holder of all documents, records, certificates etc. so the Secretary would naturally be the Principle in the Agent relationship.

Welcome friends to Lawful America's Private & Secured Website... We offer Informational and Educational facts and truths about what has plagued Our Nation for many years and still continues to operate (bankruptcy) under false pretenses and corruption... 
We offer ways and solutions...fact finding truths in Law... Information that can assist in one's own research and discoveries.. We DO NOT want any money! Freedom has no price! Freedom should be FREE of charge, FREE from control! But we have to look at the reality of this. As you can tell nothing in commerce (government) is free. Yes we will have to pay for services in order to regain our Living Man or Woman back...To Correct Our Status... Claim Our Title... Stand on The Land! We humble ourselves to strive hard to provide you with the latest information on certain topics! We offer thought provoking information to accurately help educate and inform those who may be unaware of certain topics and issues... 
The time has come America to stand on what this Country actually represents and Unite as We The People and rightfully, LAWFULLY take back Our Land, Our Country! Stop consenting and contracting with the corporation. Stop giving them power and the presumption that they have jurisdiction over us...
I pray that you gather as much knowledge and information as possible to help understanding exactly what is going on in the world today! All that we ask of you is to share the message to others that are in need and are looking for the truth and cannot find it! I know that God will reveal this through Our Spirit, His people will come to the realization and understanding of what they are up against. How these satanic rulers (corporate govenment) have engaged in evil acts of treason, corruption, bribery, conspiracy, illegal, unlawful, etc... against us! 
Everyone far and wide come together for a common purpose, a common understanding from one man to another... We are a community of people with one common goal.. Lets beat this evil and claim Our status as a Living Free Man or Woman! God Bless! 
* I also wanna add in here that NOT ONLY does these processes work for America, but other corporate ran government (countries)... If there are people out there from other parts of the world that would like to learn more about what they need to do in order to free themselves from their government and how to claim their deed/title to the corporate fiction, then the information we provide can and will help you out!!!!  
**Tactical [Sovereignty] Administrating the Estate Facebook Group**
Click here to Join Our Home Group on Facebook called Tactical [sovereighty]... 

This is for those who are TRULY interested in Sovereignty and to share information about this to all Americans and Anon's.

The knowledge of freedom should be Free, and we are here from the "Nation of God" to forward this knowledge.
Speech is also a freedom, but there is no freedom without boundaries. This being stated, any and all posts regarding violence, hate, or vulgarity will NOT be tolerated! The spirit of freedom can only be enjoyed through peace, love, and tolerance.
Please enjoy this group with an ultimate goal of declaring SOVEREIGNTY!
We gladly invite all Anon's and Sovereigns to aid in this quest to return from "Beyond the seas", and reclaim our Birthright!
Remember, information in this group, and from its members are not to be used as legal advice, and are for entertainment purposes only.
To me entertainment is equal to information, it's all about the delivery! This group is about, Status correction

Did you know what you got into when you got a marriage license from the state? You were tricked into signing over your children to the state! The Real Truth about Marriage... Click above to learn more!
If you do not know the information below...then you do not know
the foundations of American govenment and Law


In any case, if you fail to object to the government’s view of your citizenship 

status, then the federal government will PRESUME that you agree with their view and 

that you are subject to the acts-statutes of the federal government. That means you 

have waived your rights, and now possess only privileges as granted by the federal 

government. Therefore, the most practical method for a man to retain his rights as a individual sovereign is to reject the title of “citizen” and to state explicitly that one is NOT a “citizen of the United States” or a “citizen of a State”; and that one does NOT consent to federal jurisdiction and waives all benefits and privileges resulting from being a “citizen of the United States” or a “citizen of a State”..... 


And, for goodness sake, do NOT ever claim to be a “sovereign citizen” – an obvious contradiction in terms, since one cannot possibly be a “citizen” and still retain one’s sovereignty...

The fact is that the United States of America was NEVER intended to be a democracy. Rather, it was intended to be a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, with the central (federal) government having very few and limited powers and extremely limited jurisdiction; and the States having all other powers not delegated to the central government in the Constitution. Even Alexander Hamilton, arguing in the Federalist Papers that a “Bill of Rights” was NOT needed, wrote that the Federal Government could NEVER exercise any power or authority that was not explicitly enumerated in the Constitution.

Republic: A government in which the powers of sovereignty are vested in the people and are exercised by the people, either directly, or through representatives chosen by the people, to whom those powers are specially delegated. In re Duncan, 139 U.S. 449, 11 S.Ct. 573, 35 L.Ed. 219; Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162, 22 L.Ed. 627. Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 626  

Democracy. That form of government in which the sovereign power resides in and is exercised by thewhole body of free citizens directly, or indirectly through a system of representation, as distinguished from a monarchy, aristocracy, or oligarchy. Black’s Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, p. 388

Of course, the federal government has greatly expanded its powers, at the expense of the States and the People. But the most fundamental principle of any written constitution is that government CANNOT do whatever it chooses! The U.S. never was intended to be, never was and is still NOT a democracy.

“The authority to judge what are the powers of the government, and what are the liberties of the people, must necessarily be vested in one or the other of the parties themselves–the government, or the people; because there is no third party to whom it can be entrusted. If the authority be vested in the government, the government is absoluteand the people have no liberties except such as the government sees fit to indulge them with.” Lysander Spooner

“The powers delegated by the Constitution to the federal government are FEW and DEFINED [explicitly stated within the Constitution]. Those which remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The powers reserved to the States will extend to all the objects which concern the lives, liberties and properties of the people.” James Madison “No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.” Alexander Hamilton “Do not separate text [of the Constitution] from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government.” James Madison


Ninth Amendment (Bill of Rights)– “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the People.”  (re: RIGHTS)


Tenth Amendment – “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the People.”  (re: POWERS; and NOT RIGHTS)

“The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy. One’s right to life, liberty and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly may NOT be submitted to vote; they depend on no elections.” Robert H. Jackson, Justice, U.S. Supreme Court

“The particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void.” (John Marshall, Chief Justice of U.S. Supreme Court, Marbury v. Madison)

“The several states composing the United States of America are NOT united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government; but by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general government for the special purposes [and] delegated to that government certain definite (defined) powers and whensoever the general government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force. To this compact each state acceded as a state, and is an integral party, its co-states forming, as to itself, the other party. The government created by this compact was NOT made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself, since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers.”  Thomas Jefferson: Delegated, Defined and Limited Powers by U.S. Constitution  (in his draft of the Kentucky Resolutions of 1798)

“To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all constitutional questions is a very dangerous doctrine indeed, and one which would place us under the despotism of an oligarchy. Our judges are as honest as other men and not more so. They have with others the same passions for party, for power, and the privilege of their corps… and their power is more dangerous as they are in office for life and not responsible, as the other functionaries are, to the elective control. The Constitution has erected no such tribunal, knowing that to whatever hands confided, with the corruption of time and party, its members would become despots.”  — Thomas Jefferson  – Ultimate Arbiters of All Constitutional Questions: NOT Judges

[in opposition to Marbury v Madison decision by Supreme Court]

“On every question of construction [interpretation] [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.” Thomas Jefferson

“If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an AMENDMENT in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be NO change by usurpation [“power grabs”]; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed.” George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796



                               *********(((What is Sovereignty)))*********


In old England the land was owned by the king (the sovereign), who would grant permission to select people to use this land in exchange for political, financial and military support. In modern legal terms we would say that the king possessed “allodial title” to all land and the nobles possessed “equity title” – the nobles could use the land, but all land was ultimately owned by the king. (In America prior to 1993 the people, as individual sovereigns, possessed “allodial title” to land they owned. Since 1993 Americans – with the exception of some parts of Texas – possess their land under “equity title” only, as their land was seized by the United States municipal corporation ) Under English law ALL land must be owned by a someone (a man or corporation); there is no such thing as un-owned land, (English law can be contrasted with some other cultures where there is no concept of private, personal land ownership, e.g., American Indians throughout the Americas, various cultures of the South Pacific prior to colonization by Europeans.) In turn these nobles (along with a very few freemen landowners or “freeholders”) rented this land to tenant farmers. If a non-landowner wished to cultivate land, he was forced to rent this land by: 

1.) swearing an oath of allegiance to his landlord; 

2.) agreeing to turn over rental payments to his landlord; and 

3.) agreeing to the rules as set forth by his landlord. 

The concept of swearing an oath is extremely important in English and American law. In old England, “swearing an oath” or “pledging” was considered a contract, provided “consideration” was exchanged between the parties to the oath – such as allegiance and rent to one’s landlord in exchange the use of land and protection. Breaking that oath or contract was considered a “dishonoring” of the offended party and created a “cause of action” for the offended under commercial law, who then had the right to seek remedy in court. (One should be cognizant of the fact that all contract-commercial law is based on the system of “honor” and “dishonor”. In American courts today a man who swears an oath under penalty of perjury has created a contract between himself and the court – he has pledged to tell the truth in exchange for the legal protection of the court.) Prior to swearing allegiance, the English freeman possessed all the rights and protections of Natural Law (often called Fundamental Law) and Common Law; he was NOT subject to the rules (“private law”) of the landlord. However, having sworn an oath to the landlord, the man became a tenant and “subject” of his landlord or “lord”. In short, by contract (i.e., what we now call “commercial law”) a freeman would surrender some of his Common Law rights in exchange for the privilege of farming the lord’s land[i], thereby making himself a “subject” of the lord – that is, the tenant was waiving the exercise of his Natural rights and placing himself under the jurisdiction of the rules or “private law” of his landlord. Similarly, “sovereignty in government” is most properly interpreted as the individual man being subject to the private rules of conduct (“private contract law”) set forth by the lord or a government, but ONLY because he knowingly and freely consented to be governed by these rules, i.e., “consent of the governed”.

The English Common Law was based on custom and precedent rather than by written code or statutes. Equity Law, initially involving royal edicts, had evolved from the royal power to order or prohibit specific acts (Chancery Law) into the power to legislate “private law”: acts, codes and statutes for those who voluntarily engage via contracts in commerce. This last point must be emphasized: since all valid contracts are voluntary and require informed consent of all parties, then the contractual “private law” created by legislated statutes, acts, codes, regulations, etc. requires the voluntary consent of all parties – “consent of the governed”. Just as a man was subject to a landlord only after he voluntarily consented to contract (“private law”) as a tenant, under the “consent of the governed” principle, so too is voluntary consent required from a man in order for him to be subject to (under the “jurisdiction” of ) legislated statutes, acts, codes and regulations. Therefore, it is vital to understand that “consent of the governed” originally meant the informed and voluntary consent of EACH individual man to a contract (such as a constitution, statute, act, code, ordinance, by-law, etc.) for and by a government.  In addition, it is essential to understand that “consent of the governed” also meant the consent of EACH individual man to any changes in that contract for government and/or to the rules of that government, such as acts-statutes, codes, regulations and ordinances. Finally, since each man is an individual sovereign, that man may Every man in colonial America, Britain and the early United States of America understood this concept. Sadly, in today’s America most people have accepted the distorted concept of a collective “consent of the governed” – that through elections a majority (or even a plurality) of the people somehow have granted consent for ALL of the people. We see clearly that “consent of the governed” meant individual man’s consent; and NOT some ethereal type of collective consent.

Following the Declaration of Independence and the American Revolution the people were and forever remain “individual sovereigns”. The concept of individual sovereignty stands on its own as a respected and valid concept, at least to those sufficiently educated and informed to understand it. As a king is a sovereign, so each man is an individual sovereign – and just as a sovereign king may consent to restrictions on his rights, so may each man so consent. But the king and the individual retain their sovereignty, which is not forfeited by any contracts or agreements. Therefore, a sovereign (either a King or an individual man) can withdraw his consent at any time for any reason.

“…at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereignty.”sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects…with none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the Chisholm v. Georgia (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL 1793 pp471-472


“The people of this State, as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. Through the medium of their Legislature they may exercise all the powers which previous to the Revolution could have been exercised either by the King alone, or by him in conjunction with his Parliament; subject only to those restrictions which have been imposed by the Constitution of this State or of the U.S.”

Lansing v. Smith, 21 D. 89., 4 Wendel 9 (1829) (New York)

“D.” = Decennial Digest

Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am.Dec. 89

10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228;

37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 1`67; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7.

NOTE: Am.Dec.=American Decision, Wend. = Wendell (N.Y.)

“There is no such thing as a power of inherent sovereignty in the government of the United States …. In this country sovereignty resides in the people, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it: All else is withheld.” — Julliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421

“The very meaning of ‘sovereignty’ is that the decree of the sovereign makes law.” American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co., 29 S.Ct. 511, 513, 213 U.S. 347, 53 L.Ed. 826, 19 Ann.Cas. 1047.

“‘Sovereignty’ means that the decree of sovereign makes law, and foreign courts cannot condemn influences persuading sovereign to make the decree.” Moscow Fire Ins. Co. of Moscow, Russia v. Bank of New York & Trust Co., 294 N.Y.S. 648, 662, 161 Misc. 903.

The concept of individual sovereignty [1] stands on its own as a respected and valid concept – at least to those sufficiently educated and informed to understand it. As a king is a sovereign, so each man is an individual sovereign – and just as a sovereign king may consent to restrictions on his rights, so may each man so consent. But the king and the individual retain their sovereignty, which is not forfeited by any contracts or agreements.


[1] SOVEREIGNTY (Black’s Law Dictionary, Fourth Edition)  “The power to do everything in a state without accountability,–to make laws, to execute and to apply them, to impose and collect taxes and levy contributions, to make war or peace, to form treaties of alliance or of commerce with foreign nations, and the like.”  Story, Const. Sec 207


“Sovereignty in government is that public authority which directs or orders what is to be done by each member associated in relation to the end of the association. It is the supreme power by which any citizen is governed and is the person or body of persons in the state to whom there is politically no superior. The necessary existence of the state and that right and power which necessarily follow is “sovereignty.””  

Today “sovereignty in government” in its most expansive sense is meant as“supreme, absolute, uncontrollable power, the absolute right to govern. The word which by itself comes nearest to being the definition of “sovereignty” is will or volition as applied to political affairs.”City of Bisbee v. Cochise County, 52 Ariz. 1, 78 P.2d 982, 986.

RESERVATION OF SOVEREIGNTY: “[15] (b) Even if the Tribe’s power to tax were derived solely from its power to exclude non-Indians from the reservation, the Tribe has the authority to impose the severance tax. Non-Indians who lawfully enter tribal lands remain subject to a tribe’s power to exclude them, which power includes the lesser power to tax or place other conditions on the non-Indian’s conduct or continued presence on the reservation. The Tribe’s role as commercial partner with petitioners should not be confused with its role as sovereign. It is one thing to find that the Tribe has agreed to sell the right to use the land and take valuable minerals from it, and quite another to find that the Tribe has abandoned its sovereign powers simply because it has not expressly reserved them through a contract. To presume that a sovereign forever waives the right to exercise one of its powers unless it expressly reserves the right to exercise that power in a commercial agreement turns the concept of sovereignty on its head. MERRION ET AL., DBA MERRION & BAYLESS, ET AL. v. JICARILLA APACHE TRIBE ET AL. 1982.SCT.394 , 455 U.S. 130, 102 S. Ct. 894, 71 L. Ed. 2d 21, 50 U.S.L.W. 4169 pp. 144-148.


***The First Place on the Internet to get Articles by Judge Anna von Reitz and Her fight to take back what is owed to We The People!!!*** Click on the flag above to check out the webpage!!!


SEE' unless we file into the Public Records, doesn't matter whether you have a court case or not, these proofs/evidence of LIFE and Appoint yourself Executor of your Estate.

Check out this site by clicking on the picture above!
STRUCTURE OF PREAMBLE:  [The preamble contains all the elements of a TRUST]
TRUSTOR: We The People [trustors]
VENUE: of the uNited States
PURPOSE: in Order to form a more perfect Uniion, establish Justice, insure 
domestic Tranquillity, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty.
BENEFICIARY: to ourselves and our Posterity,
ENABLING ACTION 1: do ordain [declare the law]
ENABLING ACTION 2: and establish [bring into existence]
WHAT: this Constitution [articles of incorporation for TRUST as a corporation]
TRUSTEE: for the United States for America. [trustee]



Sincerely,Trent Goodbaudy

Americans have allowed their individual natural rights, guaranteed by the Bill of Rights (NOT granted by government; simply guaranteed), to be whittled away until Government can now do whatever it chooses!

The peoples eyes have opened, and realized there is a cage around them, both mentally and structurally. One man heard about a door to this cage, and another had actually seen it but could not get past the barriers in front of it. Through the search they met another man who could master these barriers, but upon approaching this door they realized it was locked. Fortunately for them another man crossed their path who had a key, however it only fit one of the 3 locks which stood between them and a freedom that had been hidden in front of them all along. In time other travelers had followed the same path, meeting them at this entrance to a new way of life and provided these additional keys.
Was what any of these men possessed pointless? Let's arrive at this door to our Estate in peace, with an undivided house.
Bryan Parker, Tactical [sovereignty]






This site is the official virtual embassy for the Government of The United States of America. Most if not all Government services are linked to this site or are on this site. The National assembly hopes that people that have had difficulty maneuvering through all of the Government sites will find this one to be more convenient.

Many large countries are moving towards virtual embassies. Virtual embassies serve the same function as an onsite embassy and cheaper to operate. A country never has to worry about their embassy being attacked and saves millions in security, staff and building maintenance.

This Government hopes that this site will serve the needs of American Nationals and others more efficiently and effectively.

The ambassadors for this official virtual embassy is: Susan Kay Hanzlik and Lanny Kay Talbot

The ambassadors email is: ambassador@governmentoftheunitedstatesofamerica.international

This virtual embassy adheres to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations ratified in the year nineteen hundred and sixty-one and subjects itself to international diplomatic protocols in its operating procedures and codes.